Use role-playing activities to relate academic content to real- world scenarios by having students assume the role of key stakeholders in a lively online classroom experience. Transformational learning experiences are created as students investigate an issue through an activity-based opportunity where no outcome is pre-determined. Retire the passive learning of online lectures-past and let your students connect the classroom to everyday life by teaching through complex social issues with role-play.
Time ConsiderationProject Design: Write measurable learning objectives for the activity you are creating. Working with an ID is worthwhile to help map objectives, learning outcomes, and assessment strategies. Length: Time invested depends upon myriad factors, such as the length and complexity of an actual role- playing activity. Alternatives: Pair students and provide a common issue to investigate, but have them approach finding an evidence- based solution from different perspectives. Then, students evaluate each other’s findings using a rubric. Milestones: Continuous reflection opportunities with a series of clearly identified milestones will keep students on-target and enhance their learning. Assessment: Create a grading rubric to assist with evaluation. For team-based projects, students should evaluate their group members. Skills Utilized
Target Skills
Grading Criteria
Pros & ConsPros:
Cons:
|
Role-playing creates activity-based learning environments where
students approach complex, real-life issues from different perspectives and collaborate to find evidence- driven solutions.
Students mimicked a town hall-style meeting event where they provided recommendations to a “water management advisory board” about how freshwater supplies should be allocated to drought-stricken regions in and around the Florida Everglades. Students were given stakeholder roles (i.e. engineer, tourism operator, fisherman, environmentalist, sugar cane farmer, golf course manager, etc.). Before the online role-play event, students conducted research within their teams to form an opinion consistent with their needs and collaborated via online discussion boards. Each stakeholder-team stated their case to the advisory committee (also students), who then openly deliberated and reached a decision. As a deliverable, students submitted a formal typed response and explained how the board’s decision was consistent (or inconsistent) with the position they took as a stakeholder. Pre/Post attitude & knowledge surveys were given.